<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11257</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the notice under section 148 to reassess the petitioner&#039;s income for the assessment year 1993-94. The notice aimed to verify ownership of vehicles used in the &quot;lease/rent&quot; business to justify depreciation claims. The court found the notice legal and necessary to validate depreciation deductions, emphasizing the importance of substantiating ownership for tax compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11257</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the notice under section 148 to reassess the petitioner&#039;s income for the assessment year 1993-94. The notice aimed to verify ownership of vehicles used in the &quot;lease/rent&quot; business to justify depreciation claims. The court found the notice legal and necessary to validate depreciation deductions, emphasizing the importance of substantiating ownership for tax compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>