<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 24 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11250</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the deduction for conveyance allowance and additional conveyance allowance as actually incurred by the assessee but disallowed the deduction for incentive bonus expenditure. The court held that since the assessee had incurred the expenditure in full, there was no income escaping assessment. The court referenced previous cases to support its decision and emphasized the significance of actual expenditure in determining eligibility for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 24 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11250</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the deduction for conveyance allowance and additional conveyance allowance as actually incurred by the assessee but disallowed the deduction for incentive bonus expenditure. The court held that since the assessee had incurred the expenditure in full, there was no income escaping assessment. The court referenced previous cases to support its decision and emphasized the significance of actual expenditure in determining eligibility for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>