<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 22 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11249</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the levy of additional tax under section 143(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on an assessee claiming deductions resulting in a loss for the assessment year. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing uncertainty in the law and a retrospective amendment clarifying the levy of additional tax. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the retrospective application of the law even in the absence of dishonest intention, as clarified in previous apex court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 22 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11249</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the levy of additional tax under section 143(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on an assessee claiming deductions resulting in a loss for the assessment year. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing uncertainty in the law and a retrospective amendment clarifying the levy of additional tax. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the retrospective application of the law even in the absence of dishonest intention, as clarified in previous apex court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>