<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 840 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from the sale of plots should be taxed as &#039;capital gains&#039; rather than &#039;business income&#039;. Additionally, the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) was deemed unjustified as the advances were made from the assessee&#039;s own funds for business purposes. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee in both matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 840 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from the sale of plots should be taxed as &#039;capital gains&#039; rather than &#039;business income&#039;. Additionally, the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) was deemed unjustified as the advances were made from the assessee&#039;s own funds for business purposes. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee in both matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>