<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11237</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed appeals relating to assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96 under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s explanations for cash credits, bank deposits, and unrecorded transactions were rejected due to errors in books of account. Despite arguments on estimating sales GP, the authorities upheld additions to the appellant&#039;s income. The High Court partially allowed the appeal by reducing excess credit but dismissed the rest, emphasizing the lack of substantial legal questions and consistency in factual findings. The importance of substantial legal issues for appeal admission was highlighted, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11237</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed appeals relating to assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96 under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s explanations for cash credits, bank deposits, and unrecorded transactions were rejected due to errors in books of account. Despite arguments on estimating sales GP, the authorities upheld additions to the appellant&#039;s income. The High Court partially allowed the appeal by reducing excess credit but dismissed the rest, emphasizing the lack of substantial legal questions and consistency in factual findings. The importance of substantial legal issues for appeal admission was highlighted, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>