<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11235</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98. The court found that the reopening of assessment beyond four years was unsustainable as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the court made the rule absolute in favor of the petitioner, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11235</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98. The court found that the reopening of assessment beyond four years was unsustainable as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the court made the rule absolute in favor of the petitioner, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>