<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353406</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed re-computation and verification on various grounds, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with opportunities to present evidence and be heard. The decision highlighted the significance of adhering to principles of natural justice and substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353406</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed re-computation and verification on various grounds, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with opportunities to present evidence and be heard. The decision highlighted the significance of adhering to principles of natural justice and substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>