<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 140 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed on a non-existent entity post-amalgamation was void ab initio, directing a fresh assessment process with the amalgamated company as the assessee. The issue of excluding certain companies from comparables was remanded for reconsideration. The determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price for international transactions required the AO/TPO to provide the assessee with an opportunity to present its case. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of passing a draft assessment order post-remand to safeguard the assessee&#039;s rights, setting aside previous orders and directing compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 140 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed on a non-existent entity post-amalgamation was void ab initio, directing a fresh assessment process with the amalgamated company as the assessee. The issue of excluding certain companies from comparables was remanded for reconsideration. The determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price for international transactions required the AO/TPO to provide the assessee with an opportunity to present its case. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of passing a draft assessment order post-remand to safeguard the assessee&#039;s rights, setting aside previous orders and directing compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>