<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 136 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353400</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with various issues being remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing verifiable evidence and granting the assessee a fair opportunity to support their contentions. Key points included the reevaluation of income sources, cash deposits, expenditure deductions, and loan payments based on the evidence presented by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:13:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 136 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353400</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with various issues being remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing verifiable evidence and granting the assessee a fair opportunity to support their contentions. Key points included the reevaluation of income sources, cash deposits, expenditure deductions, and loan payments based on the evidence presented by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>