https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353382 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and remanded the matter for reconsideration after granting a personal hearing. The court directed a fresh consideration of the demand for the period from 01.04.2010 to 30.06.2012, aligning with the pending remand for the subsequent period. The court set aside the impugned order, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and instructed the respondent to consider the dropped demand order from 01.10.2013 to March 2015, emphasizing the need for a personal hearing and compliance with the law in passing fresh orders. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353382 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and remanded the matter for reconsideration after granting a personal hearing. The court directed a fresh consideration of the demand for the period from 01.04.2010 to 30.06.2012, aligning with the pending remand for the subsequent period. The court set aside the impugned order, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and instructed the respondent to consider the dropped demand order from 01.10.2013 to March 2015, emphasizing the need for a personal hearing and compliance with the law in passing fresh orders. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353382