https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353380 The Tribunal upheld the tax demand for the normal period, directing a re-quantification of the tax liability with the correct tax rate. The appeal was disposed of with these terms, emphasizing the importance of accurate calculations and considering the appellant's status in determining tax liability and penalties. The demand for the extended period was not sustained, and penalties were set aside, restricting the demand to the normal period as per Section 73(1). en-us Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353380 The Tribunal upheld the tax demand for the normal period, directing a re-quantification of the tax liability with the correct tax rate. The appeal was disposed of with these terms, emphasizing the importance of accurate calculations and considering the appellant's status in determining tax liability and penalties. The demand for the extended period was not sustained, and penalties were set aside, restricting the demand to the normal period as per Section 73(1). Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353380