<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 115 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST for insulation services due to failure to meet notification conditions. However, penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were waived under Section 80 of the Act. The appeal was partially allowed, dismissing abatement but annulling imposed penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 115 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST for insulation services due to failure to meet notification conditions. However, penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were waived under Section 80 of the Act. The appeal was partially allowed, dismissing abatement but annulling imposed penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>