<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 106 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353370</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on invoices issued through M/s. National Udyog and M/s. Ridhi Sidhi Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was found to be contentious, with the Members recording a difference of opinion on admissibility. As the Members did not reach a common view on whether the credit was legally available, the matter was directed to be placed before the President for reference to a third Member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 106 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353370</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on invoices issued through M/s. National Udyog and M/s. Ridhi Sidhi Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was found to be contentious, with the Members recording a difference of opinion on admissibility. As the Members did not reach a common view on whether the credit was legally available, the matter was directed to be placed before the President for reference to a third Member.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>