<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 59 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11214</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the initiation of proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the reassessment was justified as subsequent specific information contradicted the original disclosure, supporting the formation of a &quot;reason to believe&quot; by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized that its decision only pertained to the initiation of proceedings, leaving the assessment of merits to the Assessing Officer based on evidence. Additionally, a miscellaneous application regarding the Deputy Director of Investigation&#039;s report was deemed untimely, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s right to be confronted with all material during assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 59 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11214</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the initiation of proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the reassessment was justified as subsequent specific information contradicted the original disclosure, supporting the formation of a &quot;reason to believe&quot; by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized that its decision only pertained to the initiation of proceedings, leaving the assessment of merits to the Assessing Officer based on evidence. Additionally, a miscellaneous application regarding the Deputy Director of Investigation&#039;s report was deemed untimely, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s right to be confronted with all material during assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>