<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 470 - Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal, Tamil Nadu</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197308</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was determined item-wise by testing whether each disputed item qualified as capital goods used in or in relation to manufacture. Machinery components, spares and accessories were treated as eligible, while consumables and items used for civil construction, lighting or other non-qualifying purposes were excluded. The tribunal relied on earlier Tribunal and Supreme Court authority to support admissibility for items where credit had been denied and to sustain denial where the goods did not meet the rule. Credit was therefore admissible only on eligible items, with the assessee succeeding to the extent of the denied credit and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:42:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 470 - Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal, Tamil Nadu</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197308</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was determined item-wise by testing whether each disputed item qualified as capital goods used in or in relation to manufacture. Machinery components, spares and accessories were treated as eligible, while consumables and items used for civil construction, lighting or other non-qualifying purposes were excluded. The tribunal relied on earlier Tribunal and Supreme Court authority to support admissibility for items where credit had been denied and to sustain denial where the goods did not meet the rule. Credit was therefore admissible only on eligible items, with the assessee succeeding to the extent of the denied credit and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>