<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11193</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the taxability of foreign travel expenses paid by a company for the assessee under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the expenses constituted a gratuitous payment from the company to the assessee, falling within the scope of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the Revenue could assess the amount as income in the hands of the assessee, despite being allowed as a deduction for the company, emphasizing the lack of commercial expediency in the payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11193</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the taxability of foreign travel expenses paid by a company for the assessee under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the expenses constituted a gratuitous payment from the company to the assessee, falling within the scope of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the Revenue could assess the amount as income in the hands of the assessee, despite being allowed as a deduction for the company, emphasizing the lack of commercial expediency in the payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>