<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 577 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197303</link>
    <description>Rectification of the register of members was unavailable where transferors had agreed to sell their shares, received consideration, delivered signed transfer forms, and the transfers were supported by endorsed forms, duplicate certificates and board approval. Allegations of fraud, fabrication, defects in duplicate certificates, and non-compliance with transfer and stamp requirements could not be conclusively determined in summary rectification proceedings on the facts established. The articles permitted transfers between members at the fair value fixed by the transferor, and the agreed price satisfied that condition. Contested contractual claims that the arrangement had become infructuous did not justify rectification, leaving the share transfers undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 577 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197303</link>
      <description>Rectification of the register of members was unavailable where transferors had agreed to sell their shares, received consideration, delivered signed transfer forms, and the transfers were supported by endorsed forms, duplicate certificates and board approval. Allegations of fraud, fabrication, defects in duplicate certificates, and non-compliance with transfer and stamp requirements could not be conclusively determined in summary rectification proceedings on the facts established. The articles permitted transfers between members at the fair value fixed by the transferor, and the agreed price satisfied that condition. Contested contractual claims that the arrangement had become infructuous did not justify rectification, leaving the share transfers undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>