<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 577 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197303</link>
    <description>In rectification proceedings, allegations of fraud, fabrication, and non-compliance with share transfer formalities were not proved where the petitioners had agreed to sell, received consideration, delivered signed blank transfer forms, and the transfer deeds were supported by endorsements, duplicate share certificates, and board approval. The statutory objections to the transfer and duplicate certificate process were rejected on the facts found, so invalidity of the transfer was not established. The articles of association were read as permitting transfer to another member at the fair value fixed by the transferor, and the agreed price was treated as that value. The plea that the arrangement had become infructuous involved disputed facts and contractual questions unsuitable for rectification jurisdiction, so no rectification was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 577 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197303</link>
      <description>In rectification proceedings, allegations of fraud, fabrication, and non-compliance with share transfer formalities were not proved where the petitioners had agreed to sell, received consideration, delivered signed blank transfer forms, and the transfer deeds were supported by endorsements, duplicate share certificates, and board approval. The statutory objections to the transfer and duplicate certificate process were rejected on the facts found, so invalidity of the transfer was not established. The articles of association were read as permitting transfer to another member at the fair value fixed by the transferor, and the agreed price was treated as that value. The plea that the arrangement had become infructuous involved disputed facts and contractual questions unsuitable for rectification jurisdiction, so no rectification was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>