<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 955 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197297</link>
    <description>Subsequent developments that materially affect entitlement to relief in eviction proceedings may be considered even at the appellate stage, including changes bearing on bona fide need and comparative hardship. Where the existing findings are insufficient to assess those changed circumstances, the court should not order a broad remand if a narrower course will suffice. A limited remand confined to taking evidence on the later events was the proper procedural approach, especially where prolonged litigation would otherwise be caused. The broad remand was therefore set aside and the matter restored for a confined enquiry on the subsequent developments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 10:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 955 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197297</link>
      <description>Subsequent developments that materially affect entitlement to relief in eviction proceedings may be considered even at the appellate stage, including changes bearing on bona fide need and comparative hardship. Where the existing findings are insufficient to assess those changed circumstances, the court should not order a broad remand if a narrower course will suffice. A limited remand confined to taking evidence on the later events was the proper procedural approach, especially where prolonged litigation would otherwise be caused. The broad remand was therefore set aside and the matter restored for a confined enquiry on the subsequent developments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>