https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197296 Cenvat credit on group insurance premium and rent-a-cab services was treated as admissible where the input services had a sufficient nexus with the output services and earlier coordinate and higher forum decisions had already settled the issue in favour of eligibility. On that basis, the demand, together with interest and penalties, was not sustained. The discussion states that once binding precedent recognises such services as eligible input services under the credit scheme, credit cannot be denied merely on a restrictive nexus objection. en-us Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197296 Cenvat credit on group insurance premium and rent-a-cab services was treated as admissible where the input services had a sufficient nexus with the output services and earlier coordinate and higher forum decisions had already settled the issue in favour of eligibility. On that basis, the demand, together with interest and penalties, was not sustained. The discussion states that once binding precedent recognises such services as eligible input services under the credit scheme, credit cannot be denied merely on a restrictive nexus objection. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197296