<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 83 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353347</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the income was estimated differently at various levels, and there was no specific charge of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Therefore, the penalty was deemed to be deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The decision was rendered on 27/12/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 09:18:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 83 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353347</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the income was estimated differently at various levels, and there was no specific charge of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Therefore, the penalty was deemed to be deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The decision was rendered on 27/12/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>