<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 82 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of the write-off of a rental deposit and the deduction claimed for cash theft. The Tribunal held that the rental deposit was not eligible for deduction as a bad debt due to an ongoing legal dispute with the landlord. Additionally, the deduction for cash theft was rejected due to lack of evidence supporting the claim. The decision was rendered on December 15, 2017, by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 09:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 82 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of the write-off of a rental deposit and the deduction claimed for cash theft. The Tribunal held that the rental deposit was not eligible for deduction as a bad debt due to an ongoing legal dispute with the landlord. Additionally, the deduction for cash theft was rejected due to lack of evidence supporting the claim. The decision was rendered on December 15, 2017, by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>