<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11186</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It allowed the deduction of the overriding charge as a diversion of income and upheld the classification of the assessee as an &#039;industrial company&#039; under the Finance Act, 1979. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal principles and precedents to support its conclusions, ensuring a thorough examination of the issues at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11186</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It allowed the deduction of the overriding charge as a diversion of income and upheld the classification of the assessee as an &#039;industrial company&#039; under the Finance Act, 1979. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of legal principles and precedents to support its conclusions, ensuring a thorough examination of the issues at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>