https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353333 The appeals were rejected due to misdeclarations of imported goods, but redemption fines and penalties were reduced to 10% of the original amount imposed by the adjudicating authority. The appellants had admitted to misdeclaration to evade customs duty, leading to confiscation of goods and penalties. Despite differences of opinion among Members, one Member advocated for the reduction based on correct declarations, while the other upheld original penalties due to admitted abetment and gross misdeclarations. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353333 The appeals were rejected due to misdeclarations of imported goods, but redemption fines and penalties were reduced to 10% of the original amount imposed by the adjudicating authority. The appellants had admitted to misdeclaration to evade customs duty, leading to confiscation of goods and penalties. Despite differences of opinion among Members, one Member advocated for the reduction based on correct declarations, while the other upheld original penalties due to admitted abetment and gross misdeclarations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353333