https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353318 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the exporter's appeal regarding the rejection of refund claims, citing Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The Tribunal granted the appeal, set aside the rejection, and provided consequential relief to the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal found subsequent show cause notices issued after a jurisdictional change to be unsustainable, granting the appellant interest on the refund, to be calculated three months from the refund application date, with directions for timely payment by the adjudicating authority. en-us Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2018 08:31:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353318 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the exporter's appeal regarding the rejection of refund claims, citing Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The Tribunal granted the appeal, set aside the rejection, and provided consequential relief to the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal found subsequent show cause notices issued after a jurisdictional change to be unsustainable, granting the appellant interest on the refund, to be calculated three months from the refund application date, with directions for timely payment by the adjudicating authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353318