<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 53 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353317</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for restoration of Appeal No. ST/325/2010, finding that the order disposing of the appeal was on merits, and the appellant failed to establish a case for restoration. The Tribunal noted that the hearing notice was sent to the appellant&#039;s last address and Counsel on record. Considering the Grounds of Appeal and a precedent upheld by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that the non-attendance was intentional, leading to the dismissal of the restoration application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 08:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=502019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 53 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353317</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for restoration of Appeal No. ST/325/2010, finding that the order disposing of the appeal was on merits, and the appellant failed to establish a case for restoration. The Tribunal noted that the hearing notice was sent to the appellant&#039;s last address and Counsel on record. Considering the Grounds of Appeal and a precedent upheld by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that the non-attendance was intentional, leading to the dismissal of the restoration application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>