https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353315 The Court directed the Commission to proceed further from the stage of the order dated 27.2.2017, finding that the petitioners had crossed the initial stage under section 32F(1) of the Act. The Court emphasized that if the Commission intended to hear the petitioners further, it should have done so within 14 days of issuing the notice. As the order of 27.2.2017 was deemed a final rejection, the Court instructed the Commission to move forward from that point, leading to the disposal of the petition. en-us Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2018 08:30:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353315 The Court directed the Commission to proceed further from the stage of the order dated 27.2.2017, finding that the petitioners had crossed the initial stage under section 32F(1) of the Act. The Court emphasized that if the Commission intended to hear the petitioners further, it should have done so within 14 days of issuing the notice. As the order of 27.2.2017 was deemed a final rejection, the Court instructed the Commission to move forward from that point, leading to the disposal of the petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353315