https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353312 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant complied with Rule 7 before the 2012 amendment, allowing distribution of CENVAT credit among units without pro rata distribution. The demand to disallow the credit was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals. The consistent judicial view supported the appellant's position, resolving the issue definitively. en-us Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353312 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant complied with Rule 7 before the 2012 amendment, allowing distribution of CENVAT credit among units without pro rata distribution. The demand to disallow the credit was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals. The consistent judicial view supported the appellant's position, resolving the issue definitively. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353312