<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1279 - ITAT,DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197293</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal invalidated the notice issued under Section 153C as the seized documents did not belong to the assessee, rendering the subsequent assessment void ab initio. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 4,50,00,000 as undisclosed capital gain was deemed unjustified. The tribunal allowed the cross-objection by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 08:13:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1279 - ITAT,DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197293</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal invalidated the notice issued under Section 153C as the seized documents did not belong to the assessee, rendering the subsequent assessment void ab initio. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 4,50,00,000 as undisclosed capital gain was deemed unjustified. The tribunal allowed the cross-objection by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>