https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197268 The court held that the suit was barred by limitation under section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It found that the respondent's claim, based on an amount due as of 28.05.1988, was filed on 27.05.1991, exceeding the limitation period. Additionally, the court ruled that the 'C' Forms presented did not constitute acknowledgments of liability under section 19 of the Act. As a result, the court set aside the previous judgment and decree, disposing of the appeal accordingly. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197268 The court held that the suit was barred by limitation under section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It found that the respondent's claim, based on an amount due as of 28.05.1988, was filed on 27.05.1991, exceeding the limitation period. Additionally, the court ruled that the 'C' Forms presented did not constitute acknowledgments of liability under section 19 of the Act. As a result, the court set aside the previous judgment and decree, disposing of the appeal accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197268