<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1250 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197267</link>
    <description>Pendency of an appeal against an order concerning reference to arbitration does not, by itself, prevent consideration of an application for appointment of an arbitrator, because the statutory scheme allows arbitration to be commenced or continued despite a pending section 8 challenge. An arbitration agreement under section 7 must be a written agreement between the parties to submit disputes to arbitration; a unilateral testamentary declaration expressing a wish for future disputes to go to arbitration is not enough. In the absence of a signed document, exchanged communications, or pleadings admitting the agreement, the precondition for appointment under section 11 is not satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 16:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1250 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197267</link>
      <description>Pendency of an appeal against an order concerning reference to arbitration does not, by itself, prevent consideration of an application for appointment of an arbitrator, because the statutory scheme allows arbitration to be commenced or continued despite a pending section 8 challenge. An arbitration agreement under section 7 must be a written agreement between the parties to submit disputes to arbitration; a unilateral testamentary declaration expressing a wish for future disputes to go to arbitration is not enough. In the absence of a signed document, exchanged communications, or pleadings admitting the agreement, the precondition for appointment under section 11 is not satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>