https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197265 An interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 could not be used to restrain termination of determinable commercial agreements. The court applied the principle that a contract incapable of specific performance cannot ordinarily be enforced by injunction, and found that the technical collaboration agreements were terminable on specified events and did not contain any negative covenant attracting the narrow exception under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Even if termination was later shown to be wrongful, the proper remedy would be damages or compensation, not specific enforcement by injunction. en-us Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 16:01:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197265 An interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 could not be used to restrain termination of determinable commercial agreements. The court applied the principle that a contract incapable of specific performance cannot ordinarily be enforced by injunction, and found that the technical collaboration agreements were terminable on specified events and did not contain any negative covenant attracting the narrow exception under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Even if termination was later shown to be wrongful, the proper remedy would be damages or compensation, not specific enforcement by injunction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197265