<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1470 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197262</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction in complaints alleging continuing cruelty and dowry harassment can extend beyond the place where individual acts occurred when the offence is continuing and its consequential effect ensues elsewhere. Applying Sections 177, 178 and 179 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the SC noted that the complaint pleaded ill-treatment at the matrimonial home, removal of the complainant to her parental home at Gaya under threat, and continued harassment. On those facts, Gaya was a where the offence continued and where its consequence ensued, so the Magistrate there had territorial jurisdiction and the proceedings were maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1470 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197262</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction in complaints alleging continuing cruelty and dowry harassment can extend beyond the place where individual acts occurred when the offence is continuing and its consequential effect ensues elsewhere. Applying Sections 177, 178 and 179 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the SC noted that the complaint pleaded ill-treatment at the matrimonial home, removal of the complainant to her parental home at Gaya under threat, and continued harassment. On those facts, Gaya was a where the offence continued and where its consequence ensued, so the Magistrate there had territorial jurisdiction and the proceedings were maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>