https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197261 A determinable distributorship agreement cannot be specifically enforced, so restoration of the distributorship is impermissible where termination is found invalid under the contract. Relief in such cases is confined to compensation consistent with the contractual notice period rather than reinstatement of the contractual relationship. Monetary relief for the notice period was sustained, while the direction to pay for cylinders was rejected because the cylinders were the Corporation's property. The refund of demand drafts was left undisturbed on the factual finding recorded, and the award was otherwise modified to align the remedies with the contract and the nature of a revocable agreement. en-us Mon, 19 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 15:03:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197261 A determinable distributorship agreement cannot be specifically enforced, so restoration of the distributorship is impermissible where termination is found invalid under the contract. Relief in such cases is confined to compensation consistent with the contractual notice period rather than reinstatement of the contractual relationship. Monetary relief for the notice period was sustained, while the direction to pay for cylinders was rejected because the cylinders were the Corporation's property. The refund of demand drafts was left undisturbed on the factual finding recorded, and the award was otherwise modified to align the remedies with the contract and the nature of a revocable agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197261