https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197260 Territorial jurisdiction in a Section 138 NI Act prosecution is determined by the composite set of acts completing the offence, including drawing, presentation, dishonour, notice, and failure to pay, so jurisdiction may lie where any constituent act occurred under Sections 177 to 179 CrPC. On the materials cited, negotiations, invoicing, receipt of payments, and cheque presentation were alleged in Delhi, creating factual that could not be conclusively rejected at the threshold. Inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is exercised sparingly and not to resolve disputed facts at inception; because the jurisdictional controversy required evidence, quashing of the summoning order was declined and the issue was left for trial. en-us Mon, 31 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:47:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197260 Territorial jurisdiction in a Section 138 NI Act prosecution is determined by the composite set of acts completing the offence, including drawing, presentation, dishonour, notice, and failure to pay, so jurisdiction may lie where any constituent act occurred under Sections 177 to 179 CrPC. On the materials cited, negotiations, invoicing, receipt of payments, and cheque presentation were alleged in Delhi, creating factual that could not be conclusively rejected at the threshold. Inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is exercised sparingly and not to resolve disputed facts at inception; because the jurisdictional controversy required evidence, quashing of the summoning order was declined and the issue was left for trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197260