https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197257 A speaking order of a statutory authority exercising a judicial function may be quashed in certiorari under Article 226 where an error of law is apparent on the face of the record, not merely for jurisdictional error. Applying that principle, the court construed the statute and relevant Statutes to mean that a member elected or appointed to a body continues in office only so long as the statutory condition in the proviso is satisfied, without adding implied qualifications. On that reading, the Chancellor's view that the petitioner ceased to be a member after retirement was legally unsustainable, so the impugned order was quashed; mandamus failed for want of proof of intended interference. en-us Fri, 29 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 12:35:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197257 A speaking order of a statutory authority exercising a judicial function may be quashed in certiorari under Article 226 where an error of law is apparent on the face of the record, not merely for jurisdictional error. Applying that principle, the court construed the statute and relevant Statutes to mean that a member elected or appointed to a body continues in office only so long as the statutory condition in the proviso is satisfied, without adding implied qualifications. On that reading, the Chancellor's view that the petitioner ceased to be a member after retirement was legally unsustainable, so the impugned order was quashed; mandamus failed for want of proof of intended interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197257