https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197252 The Court upheld the penalty imposed by the Central Excise Settlement Commission, emphasizing the petitioner's admission and the absence of statutory violation in the Commission's decision. The Court declined to interfere, noting the Commission's focus on settlement rather than adjudication. The petitioner's challenge based on Section 11AC was deemed unavailable due to lack of adjudication and statutory violation. The judgment underscores limited judicial review in settlement cases without statutory breaches, ultimately dismissing the writ petition. en-us Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 10:09:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197252 The Court upheld the penalty imposed by the Central Excise Settlement Commission, emphasizing the petitioner's admission and the absence of statutory violation in the Commission's decision. The Court declined to interfere, noting the Commission's focus on settlement rather than adjudication. The petitioner's challenge based on Section 11AC was deemed unavailable due to lack of adjudication and statutory violation. The judgment underscores limited judicial review in settlement cases without statutory breaches, ultimately dismissing the writ petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197252