<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 30 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353294</link>
    <description>Recovery of duty drawback under Rule 16A of the Customs and Central Excise Duty Drawback Rules, 1995 was examined in relation to exports made before the rule came into force. The court treated Rule 16A as a clarificatory provision that could operate retrospectively only within the existing statutory scheme, but held that a notice issued under that rule could not sustain the department&#039;s recovery attempt in the manner proposed. The show cause notice was therefore quashed and set aside, and the recovery action was annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 06:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 30 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353294</link>
      <description>Recovery of duty drawback under Rule 16A of the Customs and Central Excise Duty Drawback Rules, 1995 was examined in relation to exports made before the rule came into force. The court treated Rule 16A as a clarificatory provision that could operate retrospectively only within the existing statutory scheme, but held that a notice issued under that rule could not sustain the department&#039;s recovery attempt in the manner proposed. The show cause notice was therefore quashed and set aside, and the recovery action was annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>