<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 27 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353291</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed by the Tribunal, resulting in the deletion of disallowances and additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the sufficiency of own funds, the absence of exempt income, and the principle that hypothetical income cannot be taxed, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee in both issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 21:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 27 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353291</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed by the Tribunal, resulting in the deletion of disallowances and additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the sufficiency of own funds, the absence of exempt income, and the principle that hypothetical income cannot be taxed, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee in both issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>