<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 26 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties for false deduction claims under Chapter VIA for both assessment years but set aside penalties for unexplained cash deposits, as the explanations were unproved but not found false. The appeals were partly allowed, affirming penalties for false deduction claims while overturning penalties for unexplained cash deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 21:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 26 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties for false deduction claims under Chapter VIA for both assessment years but set aside penalties for unexplained cash deposits, as the explanations were unproved but not found false. The appeals were partly allowed, affirming penalties for false deduction claims while overturning penalties for unexplained cash deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>