<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 24 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353288</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, restricting additions to the profit element of alleged bogus purchases at 12.5% for A.Ys 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. The appeals challenging the quantum of purchases and validity of the CIT(A)&#039;s orders were dismissed, with the tribunal deeming the CIT(A)&#039;s approach reasonable and legally sound. The consolidated order for all three assessment years resulted in consistent findings and conclusions, ultimately upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 06:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 24 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353288</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, restricting additions to the profit element of alleged bogus purchases at 12.5% for A.Ys 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. The appeals challenging the quantum of purchases and validity of the CIT(A)&#039;s orders were dismissed, with the tribunal deeming the CIT(A)&#039;s approach reasonable and legally sound. The consolidated order for all three assessment years resulted in consistent findings and conclusions, ultimately upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>