<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1533 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353264</link>
    <description>Freight and transportation charges separately collected over and above the invoice value are not includible in the assessable value of excisable goods merely because they are not shown separately in the excise invoice. The separate disclosure in the invoice serves only to identify the actual freight amount; it does not change the character of transportation charges where they are separately negotiated and otherwise ascertainable. On that basis, the demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 20:55:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1533 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353264</link>
      <description>Freight and transportation charges separately collected over and above the invoice value are not includible in the assessable value of excisable goods merely because they are not shown separately in the excise invoice. The separate disclosure in the invoice serves only to identify the actual freight amount; it does not change the character of transportation charges where they are separately negotiated and otherwise ascertainable. On that basis, the demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>