https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197247 The appeals challenging penalty imposition under the Finance Act 1994 were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore. The appellant's failure to disclose correct taxability, suppression of taxable services value, and non-remittance of collected tax to the Government led to the penalty being upheld. Despite discharging the service tax liability later, the penalty remained justified due to the appellant's actions. The judgment emphasized the importance of tax compliance and upheld the lower authority's decision, rejecting the appeals. The judgment was delivered on 25/07/2017. en-us Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 18:55:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197247 The appeals challenging penalty imposition under the Finance Act 1994 were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore. The appellant's failure to disclose correct taxability, suppression of taxable services value, and non-remittance of collected tax to the Government led to the penalty being upheld. Despite discharging the service tax liability later, the penalty remained justified due to the appellant's actions. The judgment emphasized the importance of tax compliance and upheld the lower authority's decision, rejecting the appeals. The judgment was delivered on 25/07/2017. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197247