https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197238 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the refund claim rejection under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's refund claim for various services was initially denied, but the Tribunal found that the services had a nexus with the output services provided by the appellant, as established in a previous case. The decision emphasized the need to establish a direct link between input and output services for refund eligibility under CENVAT rules, relying on precedent cases to determine service eligibility for credit/refund. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 18:54:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197238 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the refund claim rejection under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's refund claim for various services was initially denied, but the Tribunal found that the services had a nexus with the output services provided by the appellant, as established in a previous case. The decision emphasized the need to establish a direct link between input and output services for refund eligibility under CENVAT rules, relying on precedent cases to determine service eligibility for credit/refund. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197238