https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197219 An arbitration clause covering connected agreements and a forest-cutting arrangement was held wide enough to embrace the dispute, so reference to arbitration could proceed despite objections. The absence of one interested person did not bar filing of the agreement or reference, because that person's share was not itself in dispute and the controversy remained capable of resolution between the contracting parties. A later agreement was treated as confirmatory and supplementary, so the proposed reference was not piecemeal. On fraud, mere allegations of incomplete, exaggerated, or suspicious accounts were not sufficient cause to refuse filing under section 20(4); only serious allegations of fraud warranting a civil trial would justify denial of the arbitral forum. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197219 An arbitration clause covering connected agreements and a forest-cutting arrangement was held wide enough to embrace the dispute, so reference to arbitration could proceed despite objections. The absence of one interested person did not bar filing of the agreement or reference, because that person's share was not itself in dispute and the controversy remained capable of resolution between the contracting parties. A later agreement was treated as confirmatory and supplementary, so the proposed reference was not piecemeal. On fraud, mere allegations of incomplete, exaggerated, or suspicious accounts were not sufficient cause to refuse filing under section 20(4); only serious allegations of fraud warranting a civil trial would justify denial of the arbitral forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197219