<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1158 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197218</link>
    <description>An undisputed arbitration clause in a partnership deed was held sufficient for reference of a dispute over partnership accounts and alleged fraud to arbitration. The Section 11 enquiry was confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement and a live dispute, and not to a detailed merits review. The allegations of fraud and mismanagement were treated as vague and not so serious or complex as to require a civil trial. The court therefore regarded the dispute as relating to the firm&#039;s accounts and affairs, which did not exclude arbitration, and appointed an arbitrator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1158 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197218</link>
      <description>An undisputed arbitration clause in a partnership deed was held sufficient for reference of a dispute over partnership accounts and alleged fraud to arbitration. The Section 11 enquiry was confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement and a live dispute, and not to a detailed merits review. The allegations of fraud and mismanagement were treated as vague and not so serious or complex as to require a civil trial. The court therefore regarded the dispute as relating to the firm&#039;s accounts and affairs, which did not exclude arbitration, and appointed an arbitrator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>