https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197217 Allegations of fraud did not, by themselves, bar reference of disputes to arbitration where the parties had an arbitration agreement. The Court held that whether the contract was vitiated by fraud could be examined by the arbitrator, and that the arbitral tribunal could also decide its own jurisdiction. On that basis, and since the arbitration was to be held at Bombay, the Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and referred the disputes to arbitration. en-us Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:58:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197217 Allegations of fraud did not, by themselves, bar reference of disputes to arbitration where the parties had an arbitration agreement. The Court held that whether the contract was vitiated by fraud could be examined by the arbitrator, and that the arbitral tribunal could also decide its own jurisdiction. On that basis, and since the arbitration was to be held at Bombay, the Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and referred the disputes to arbitration. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197217