<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 969 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the revision order passed u/s 263, finding that the Commissioner did not establish that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for a definitive finding of error before directing further enquiry. It referenced case law to support its conclusion that the original order was a possible view and not erroneous. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee challenging the revision order was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:50:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 969 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the revision order passed u/s 263, finding that the Commissioner did not establish that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for a definitive finding of error before directing further enquiry. It referenced case law to support its conclusion that the original order was a possible view and not erroneous. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee challenging the revision order was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>