<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 48 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11163</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions regarding the brokerage claimed as a business expenditure. The court emphasized the importance of brokers in property transactions and recognized market-driven brokerage rates. It was held that the appellant&#039;s discretion in determining commission rates based on real estate trends was justified, with the Tribunal rejecting disallowance based on conjecture. The court concluded that no interference was warranted in the matter, upholding the decisions of the Assessing Officer, Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), and Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 48 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11163</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions regarding the brokerage claimed as a business expenditure. The court emphasized the importance of brokers in property transactions and recognized market-driven brokerage rates. It was held that the appellant&#039;s discretion in determining commission rates based on real estate trends was justified, with the Tribunal rejecting disallowance based on conjecture. The court concluded that no interference was warranted in the matter, upholding the decisions of the Assessing Officer, Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), and Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>