<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1283 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries and accepted the assessee&#039;s claim after due consideration. The Tribunal emphasized that a mere change of opinion or inadequate inquiry does not justify the exercise of revisional jurisdiction by the Commissioner. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order under section 263 was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1283 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries and accepted the assessee&#039;s claim after due consideration. The Tribunal emphasized that a mere change of opinion or inadequate inquiry does not justify the exercise of revisional jurisdiction by the Commissioner. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order under section 263 was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>