https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353258 Clause 15 of the Letters Patent does not permit an appeal against a judgment passed in exercise of criminal jurisdiction, and the Single Judge's order dealing with refusal to return seized gold ornaments under Section 452 CrPC was therefore not appealable. On the merits, where the petitioner had already been given liberty to seek return of the ornaments before the Department under the Income-tax Act and the Department was directed to consider that request, no further writ direction was warranted. The challenge based on Article 300A and Section 132 of the Income-tax Act did not justify additional interference, and the order of the Single Judge was left undisturbed. en-us Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:44:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353258 Clause 15 of the Letters Patent does not permit an appeal against a judgment passed in exercise of criminal jurisdiction, and the Single Judge's order dealing with refusal to return seized gold ornaments under Section 452 CrPC was therefore not appealable. On the merits, where the petitioner had already been given liberty to seek return of the ornaments before the Department under the Income-tax Act and the Department was directed to consider that request, no further writ direction was warranted. The challenge based on Article 300A and Section 132 of the Income-tax Act did not justify additional interference, and the order of the Single Judge was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353258